Agent Larissa. Ptu (gru) rf is dedicated to
Preamble. I love it when rf special services try to hide agents of influence. For they do it according to the old scheme, which is long overdue for retirement
So I propose to get acquainted with agent Larissa, aka Lars Krause, who has never been burned once and is a supporter of rf "for the idea".
Honestly, it is not crucial how he was recruited (idea, money, blackmail), but it looks like Larisa got it badly wrong in her life when she worked as a part-time info-gypsy and tried to sell "knowledge" about "passive income".
No matter how cynical it sounds, but I will never believe promises to teach you how to earn a million by taking three courses from a "successful speaker" for $50, who has a lot of photos near cool cars, but no company. On the other hand, it's your life and you decide - who am I to advise anyone?
👇
Preamble. I love it when rf special services try to hide agents of influence. For they do it according to the old scheme, which is long overdue for retirement
So I propose to get acquainted with agent Larissa, aka Lars Krause, who has never been burned once and is a supporter of rf "for the idea".
Honestly, it is not crucial how he was recruited (idea, money, blackmail), but it looks like Larisa got it badly wrong in her life when she worked as a part-time info-gypsy and tried to sell "knowledge" about "passive income".
No matter how cynical it sounds, but I will never believe promises to teach you how to earn a million by taking three courses from a "successful speaker" for $50, who has a lot of photos near cool cars, but no company. On the other hand, it's your life and you decide - who am I to advise anyone?
👇
👍107💯29❤1🥱1
But let's get back to Larisa, who studied in St. Petersburg, and afterwards sold a formula for successful success, passive income, wealth in 6 weeks, but....
But when it didn't work, he remembered about his "friends" in Russia and realised that real success is to praise Russian Nazis for money and not to carry heavy things. Of course, it was a shame to part with his audience (788 subscribers, yup). He must have cried tears, because he found almost 800 morons who believe that some Vasya on the link (and most importantly inexpensive!) will quickly tell them how to make two cars of money....
But fuck it, with passive income in 6 weeks - there are those who pay more here and now, fuck. Just fuck yourself about "victory", "greatness", Anglo-Saxons, NATO and other bullshit in the right context and you'll never wear heavy. Moreover, you'll be paid more than the local vatans - you have German citizenship, yoput
Well, and then there will be the most interesting. Stay tuned
👇👇
But when it didn't work, he remembered about his "friends" in Russia and realised that real success is to praise Russian Nazis for money and not to carry heavy things. Of course, it was a shame to part with his audience (788 subscribers, yup). He must have cried tears, because he found almost 800 morons who believe that some Vasya on the link (and most importantly inexpensive!) will quickly tell them how to make two cars of money....
But fuck it, with passive income in 6 weeks - there are those who pay more here and now, fuck. Just fuck yourself about "victory", "greatness", Anglo-Saxons, NATO and other bullshit in the right context and you'll never wear heavy. Moreover, you'll be paid more than the local vatans - you have German citizenship, yoput
Well, and then there will be the most interesting. Stay tuned
👇👇
👍102💯23❤3🥱1
By the way, I even have a diploma from Larissa, Lars.
So I asked the artificial intelligence what the red rectangle means. And this is what it told me, don't switch:
If the discipline "Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Humanity" is related to the direction of training 41.04.05 "International Relations", this may indicate its interdisciplinary nature. In the context of international relations, it probably considers the role of science, rationalism and critical thinking in global politics, diplomacy and international communication.
Possible course content within the strand:
1. Science as an instrument of international influence:
- The use of scientific evidence in diplomacy and global negotiations.
- "Science diplomacy" as part of international relations.
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes.
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics:
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise policy decisions.
- The role of pseudoscience in propaganda and information warfare.
- The problem of "fake science" (e.g. climate scepticism).
3. ethics in international science communication:
- Issues related to bioethics, artificial intelligence and the technology race.
- Global challenges: dealing with climate change, pandemics and the energy crisis.
4. historical examples:
- The application of science during the Cold War (e.g., the space race or the arms race).
- World initiatives to control the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
5. Contemporary challenges and issues:
- How scientific evidence influences the policies of countries in the UN, WHO, WTO and other international organisations.
- The role of international agreements in the use of scientific findings.
Discipline Objectives:
- To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific evidence used in international policy.
- To understand how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and a tool of manipulation in the international environment.
- To explore how world powers use science to set their political agenda.
Relationship to the GEC:
Topics for final qualifying theses may include:
- The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
- Analysing the manipulation of scientific evidence in international propaganda.
- The use of science in international conflicts (e.g. climate change as a factor of political pressure).
And what follows is even more interesting. Here's what the iron (artificial intelligence) says:
👇👇👇
So I asked the artificial intelligence what the red rectangle means. And this is what it told me, don't switch:
If the discipline "Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Humanity" is related to the direction of training 41.04.05 "International Relations", this may indicate its interdisciplinary nature. In the context of international relations, it probably considers the role of science, rationalism and critical thinking in global politics, diplomacy and international communication.
Possible course content within the strand:
1. Science as an instrument of international influence:
- The use of scientific evidence in diplomacy and global negotiations.
- "Science diplomacy" as part of international relations.
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes.
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics:
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise policy decisions.
- The role of pseudoscience in propaganda and information warfare.
- The problem of "fake science" (e.g. climate scepticism).
3. ethics in international science communication:
- Issues related to bioethics, artificial intelligence and the technology race.
- Global challenges: dealing with climate change, pandemics and the energy crisis.
4. historical examples:
- The application of science during the Cold War (e.g., the space race or the arms race).
- World initiatives to control the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
5. Contemporary challenges and issues:
- How scientific evidence influences the policies of countries in the UN, WHO, WTO and other international organisations.
- The role of international agreements in the use of scientific findings.
Discipline Objectives:
- To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific evidence used in international policy.
- To understand how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and a tool of manipulation in the international environment.
- To explore how world powers use science to set their political agenda.
Relationship to the GEC:
Topics for final qualifying theses may include:
- The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
- Analysing the manipulation of scientific evidence in international propaganda.
- The use of science in international conflicts (e.g. climate change as a factor of political pressure).
And what follows is even more interesting. Here's what the iron (artificial intelligence) says:
👇👇👇
👍103💯21❤1🥱1
Curriculum of the discipline:
"Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Mankind"
Field of study: 41.04.05 "International Relations".
Level: Master's degree
Aims of the discipline
1. To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific data used in international politics.
2. to explain how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and manipulation in the international environment.
3. Explore the role of science in global diplomacy and international conflict.
4. To prepare students to work effectively in the context of information wars and data manipulation.
Objectives of the discipline
1. To provide students with a theoretical understanding of the scientific method and rationalism.
2. To show with examples how science can be used for political and diplomatic purposes.
3. To develop skills in identifying and analysing pseudoscientific information.
4. To consider ethical aspects of using scientific developments in international relations.
Main sections of the discipline
1. Science as a tool of international influence
- The use of scientific evidence in global diplomacy (e.g. Paris Climate Agreement).
- The concept of 'science diplomacy' and its examples (e.g. cooperative space exploration).
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes (example: COVID-19 and international allegations).
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise political decisions.
- The problem of pseudoscience and "fake science" (analysis of examples of climate scepticism, vaccination).
- The role of science in information wars (e.g. cybersecurity and artificial intelligence). 3.
3 Ethics in international scientific communication
- Bioethics in the context of international treaties.
- Global challenges: climate crisis, pandemics, technological races.
- Problems of responsibility of countries in the use of scientific developments.
4. historical examples
- Science during the Cold War: arms race, space, nuclear policy.
- International initiatives to limit weapons of mass destruction (e.g., Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
5. Contemporary challenges
- The role of science in the politics of international organisations: UN, WHO, WTO.
- Use of technology in international conflicts (e.g. satellite reconnaissance).
- The impact of scientific evidence on international agreements.
Practical exercises
1. case analyses:
- Example: The Paris climate agreement and its scientific basis.
- How WHO data is used in international policy.
2. Recognising manipulation:
- Working with examples of pseudoscientific publications.
- Analysing fake news in the field of science.
3. Modelling international negotiations:
- Topics: climate, technology, bioethics.
Topics for final qualification works (FQWs)
1. The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
2. Analysis of scientific data manipulation in international propaganda. 2.
3. The use of science in international conflicts: climate change as a factor of political pressure. 3.
4. The ethics of artificial intelligence in international relations.
5. Scientific research as a tool of diplomacy in the 21st century (e.g. CERN, ITER projects).
Graduate competences
After mastering the discipline, students will be able to:
- Critically evaluate scientific data and its interpretation.
- Recognise manipulation and misinformation in scientific publications.
- Use science diplomacy in professional activities.
- Develop strategies for integrating science into international negotiations.
👇👇👇👇
"Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Mankind"
Field of study: 41.04.05 "International Relations".
Level: Master's degree
Aims of the discipline
1. To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific data used in international politics.
2. to explain how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and manipulation in the international environment.
3. Explore the role of science in global diplomacy and international conflict.
4. To prepare students to work effectively in the context of information wars and data manipulation.
Objectives of the discipline
1. To provide students with a theoretical understanding of the scientific method and rationalism.
2. To show with examples how science can be used for political and diplomatic purposes.
3. To develop skills in identifying and analysing pseudoscientific information.
4. To consider ethical aspects of using scientific developments in international relations.
Main sections of the discipline
1. Science as a tool of international influence
- The use of scientific evidence in global diplomacy (e.g. Paris Climate Agreement).
- The concept of 'science diplomacy' and its examples (e.g. cooperative space exploration).
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes (example: COVID-19 and international allegations).
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise political decisions.
- The problem of pseudoscience and "fake science" (analysis of examples of climate scepticism, vaccination).
- The role of science in information wars (e.g. cybersecurity and artificial intelligence). 3.
3 Ethics in international scientific communication
- Bioethics in the context of international treaties.
- Global challenges: climate crisis, pandemics, technological races.
- Problems of responsibility of countries in the use of scientific developments.
4. historical examples
- Science during the Cold War: arms race, space, nuclear policy.
- International initiatives to limit weapons of mass destruction (e.g., Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
5. Contemporary challenges
- The role of science in the politics of international organisations: UN, WHO, WTO.
- Use of technology in international conflicts (e.g. satellite reconnaissance).
- The impact of scientific evidence on international agreements.
Practical exercises
1. case analyses:
- Example: The Paris climate agreement and its scientific basis.
- How WHO data is used in international policy.
2. Recognising manipulation:
- Working with examples of pseudoscientific publications.
- Analysing fake news in the field of science.
3. Modelling international negotiations:
- Topics: climate, technology, bioethics.
Topics for final qualification works (FQWs)
1. The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
2. Analysis of scientific data manipulation in international propaganda. 2.
3. The use of science in international conflicts: climate change as a factor of political pressure. 3.
4. The ethics of artificial intelligence in international relations.
5. Scientific research as a tool of diplomacy in the 21st century (e.g. CERN, ITER projects).
Graduate competences
After mastering the discipline, students will be able to:
- Critically evaluate scientific data and its interpretation.
- Recognise manipulation and misinformation in scientific publications.
- Use science diplomacy in professional activities.
- Develop strategies for integrating science into international negotiations.
👇👇👇👇
👍93💯18❤3🥱1